Elon's Vision
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Elon's Vision
No Result
View All Result
Home Stock

The myths and misconceptions about medical negligence

by
July 20, 2021
in Stock
0
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

If you or a loved one has suffered from medical negligence, you’ll know it can have a devastating impact – both on the person directly affected and those around them. When we get ill or sustain an injury, we expect to receive the appropriate care from medical professionals. And although most treatments are administered without a hitch, just one delay or misdiagnosis can have catastrophic consequences.

For the year 2020-21, the NHS reported 12,629 new medical negligence claims. That is an increase of 7.5% from the previous 12 months (11,678). It is thought that very few of those claims have been made in response to healthcare provided as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. There is often a lag time between the incident occurring and a claim being made, so we can expect to see those cases reflected in figures over the coming years.

And while it is undoubtedly something that nobody would ever wish to experience, the topic of medical negligence is surrounded by a certain degree of misinformation. Here, we debunk four of the most common misconceptions.

All cases are for minor injuries

This is not true. Some medical negligence claims are made as a result of a fatality. In that instance, a friend or family member of the deceased will begin proceedings on their behalf. There are also cases that occur as a result of serious injury – such as to the spine or brain. Injuries of that nature may leave the victim unable to claim for themselves, in which case a loved one will do so on their behalf.

All cases result in a big payout

There have been instances of claimants receiving a sizeable payout where their injuries have been severe. One such example is Milly Evans, who sustained serious injuries at birth in 2001 and in 2012 was awarded £10.8 million in compensation. Thankfully, however, such serious cases are less frequent, and ones that involve an allergic reaction or a minor injury are likely to result in a payout of a few thousand pounds.

Claims are driven by greedy lawyers

This is untrue. The final decision on whether to proceed with a claim is entirely down to the victim. And although medical negligence solicitors do get paid for a successful claim, many operate on a no win, no fee basis. This means if the case is unsuccessful, the claimant does not have to pay a penny.

Lawyers are out to scapegoat doctors

Medical negligence lawyers are out to serve the best interests of their client. This means holding those responsible to account, of course, but it is not about hanging the medical profession out to dry. Some people worry that any case will drain the NHS of its financial resources, but there is a separate budget, managed by NHS Resolution, that is designed to cover the cost of proceedings and settlements.

Previous Post

The pros and cons of black box car insurance

Next Post

Fiat Money Economies Are Built on Lies

Next Post
Fiat Money Economies Are Built on Lies

Fiat Money Economies Are Built on Lies

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

Jay Bhattacharya on Public Health

October 12, 2021

That Bangladesh Mask Study!

December 1, 2021

Antitrust Regulation Assumes Bureaucrats Know the “Correct” Amount of Competition

November 24, 2021
Pints of champagne could be the next ‘Brexit dividend’

Pints of champagne could be the next ‘Brexit dividend’

December 24, 2021
Friday Feature: MCP Academy

Friday Feature: MCP Academy

0

0

0

0
Friday Feature: MCP Academy

Friday Feature: MCP Academy

May 9, 2025

P.T. Bauer’s Reminders on Foreign Aid

May 9, 2025
Luna Introduces PATRIOT Act Repeal Bill

Luna Introduces PATRIOT Act Repeal Bill

May 9, 2025
In Congress, a Move To Strip Courts of Contempt Powers

In Congress, a Move To Strip Courts of Contempt Powers

May 9, 2025

Recent News

Friday Feature: MCP Academy

Friday Feature: MCP Academy

May 9, 2025

P.T. Bauer’s Reminders on Foreign Aid

May 9, 2025
Luna Introduces PATRIOT Act Repeal Bill

Luna Introduces PATRIOT Act Repeal Bill

May 9, 2025
In Congress, a Move To Strip Courts of Contempt Powers

In Congress, a Move To Strip Courts of Contempt Powers

May 9, 2025

Disclaimer: ElonsVision.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 ElonsVision. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock

Copyright © 2025 ElonsVision. All Rights Reserved.