Elon's Vision
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Elon's Vision
No Result
View All Result
Home Investing

Red tape risks turning city into ‘graveyard’, warns Bank of England official

by
October 18, 2024
in Investing
0
Red tape risks turning city into ‘graveyard’, warns Bank of England official
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Excessive regulation could turn the City of London into a “graveyard” by stifling innovation and risk-taking, Sam Woods, chief executive of the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), has warned.

Speaking at the City’s annual banquet at Mansion House, Woods cautioned that while financial regulations are necessary for stability, over-regulation could suffocate the financial sector’s ability to drive economic growth.

Woods described risk as the “lifeblood” of a thriving economy, arguing that attempting to eliminate it altogether would hinder innovation and leave the City stagnant. “Risk is the lifeblood of a thriving capitalist economy, fuelling growth and innovation,” Woods said. “The whole point of having a strong financial system is to enable society to take risks.”

His comments come amid growing concerns that Britain’s efforts to make financial institutions safer are becoming counterproductive. Woods acknowledged that the balance between regulation and risk management is difficult but crucial, noting: “It’s implausible that good businesses can thrive in an environment of ever-expanding regulation.”

Woods pointed to recent moves by the PRA, such as the decision to abolish the cap on bankers’ bonuses, as evidence of regulators taking steps to reduce the burden on the City. The cap had been “damaging to competitiveness,” he said, and scrapping it sent an important signal of intent that unnecessary regulations should be rolled back.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has also faced criticism over its increasing regulatory requirements. In February, the FCA was under fire for proposals to “name and shame” companies under investigation, and it has also faced complaints regarding rules around diversity and inclusion disclosures. Jeremy Hunt, the former chancellor, introduced a new mandate for regulators, including the FCA and PRA, to consider economic growth as a “secondary objective” to their regulatory duties. The move was seen as a direct response to concerns that regulators were holding back the City’s growth potential.

Sir Keir Starmer, who has largely followed the previous government’s regulatory approach, reinforced this direction by urging regulators to take economic growth seriously. Speaking at the International Investment Summit, Starmer said the government would force regulators to focus on growth as a priority.

Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, echoed Woods’ sentiments, describing the new growth mandate as “liberating” and leading to more open conversations about risk. Rathi and Woods both stressed the importance of striking the right balance between maintaining stability in the financial system and allowing enough flexibility for businesses to grow and take calculated risks.

David Postings, chief executive of UK Finance, the banking lobby group, agreed, saying: “If we can collectively get the balance right between risk and protection for consumers, this will help in supporting economic growth and financial inclusion in the UK.”

As regulators face mounting pressure to relax red tape and promote competitiveness, Woods’ remarks reflect a broader debate about how to balance the need for stability with the need for growth and innovation in the financial sector.

Read more:
Red tape risks turning city into ‘graveyard’, warns Bank of England official

Previous Post

Reeves considers ending salary sacrifice tax breaks for electric vehicles, sparking industry backlash

Next Post

Who Starts Business Cycles? Banks or the Fed?

Next Post

Who Starts Business Cycles? Banks or the Fed?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

Jay Bhattacharya on Public Health

October 12, 2021

That Bangladesh Mask Study!

December 1, 2021

Antitrust Regulation Assumes Bureaucrats Know the “Correct” Amount of Competition

November 24, 2021
Pints of champagne could be the next ‘Brexit dividend’

Pints of champagne could be the next ‘Brexit dividend’

December 24, 2021

“BTCMiner Dominates Cloud Mining Industry with Record-Breaking Performance and High Investor Demand: Principal and Interest Securely Locked”

0

0

0

0

“BTCMiner Dominates Cloud Mining Industry with Record-Breaking Performance and High Investor Demand: Principal and Interest Securely Locked”

July 12, 2025

Texas Flood Debacle a Predictable Result of 98 Years of Government Flood “Control”

July 12, 2025

Social Engineering under the Fourteenth Amendment

July 12, 2025

Social Engineering under the Fourteenth Amendment

July 12, 2025

Recent News

“BTCMiner Dominates Cloud Mining Industry with Record-Breaking Performance and High Investor Demand: Principal and Interest Securely Locked”

July 12, 2025

Texas Flood Debacle a Predictable Result of 98 Years of Government Flood “Control”

July 12, 2025

Social Engineering under the Fourteenth Amendment

July 12, 2025

Social Engineering under the Fourteenth Amendment

July 12, 2025

Disclaimer: ElonsVision.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 ElonsVision. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock

Copyright © 2025 ElonsVision. All Rights Reserved.