Elon's Vision
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Elon's Vision
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's Pick

Should the US Government Privatize the Post Office?

by
February 12, 2025
in Editor's Pick
0
Should the US Government Privatize the Post Office?
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Jeffrey Miron

President Donald Trump has reportedly shown a strong interest in privatizing the US Postal Service (USPS). Proponents of the USPS applaud its mandate to provide mail service to every American at uniform rates; critics claim it is less efficient than private competitors and no longer financially viable (if it ever was).

From its inception, the USPS was intended to be a public good, not a profit-making entity. Indeed, in 1958, federal law declared it “clearly not a business enterprise conducted for profit.” But non-profits should not be financial black holes, and universal service should not require billions in annual losses, as demonstrated by private providers.

At present, the USPS is a failing monopoly. Title 39 of the US Code hinders private carriers’ ability to compete by requiring weight minimums and USPS approval for packages. Additionally, only USPS may use mailboxes. The USPS also receives substantial financial aid from taxpayers: $120 billion since 2020. Despite this legal and fiscal aid, USPS has run a deficit every year since 2007, accumulating a total loss of $108 billion. And service quality continues to decline—between 2022 and 2024, the percentage of packages delivered on time fell substantially.

A possible response to these financial difficulties is the removal of rules that make the USPS less profitable. The USPS must offer reduced postage rates for certain users, such as non-profits, and its uniform rate requirement means serving remote areas at the same price as cities. Repealing these restrictions would allow USPS to be more competitive.

An even better response is to privatize the USPS. This would eliminate its uniform price and service mandate and allow it to close unprofitable locations. Privatizing would also eliminate restrictions on private carriers’ activity, enhancing their efficiency.

A key aspect of this privatization is that it must be complete, or nearly so. Since Britain sold a majority stake in its national postal service, the share price has fallen about 25 percent. But Royal Mail failed to eliminate the barriers that made it unprofitable, such as uniform pricing. Mail services such as FedEx and UPS show that private mail couriers can function effectively.

Ultimately, the case for privatization is one of efficiency, competition, and fiscal responsibility. By privatizing the USPS, the US could foster a competitive, market-driven postal industry that better serves consumers and taxpayers alike.

This article appeared on Substack on February 13, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

Previous Post

Economic Growth Won’t Save Social Security: New Paper Release

Next Post

Gambling site Stake shut down after investigation into controversial porn star ads

Next Post
Gambling site Stake shut down after investigation into controversial porn star ads

Gambling site Stake shut down after investigation into controversial porn star ads

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

Jay Bhattacharya on Public Health

October 12, 2021

That Bangladesh Mask Study!

December 1, 2021

Antitrust Regulation Assumes Bureaucrats Know the “Correct” Amount of Competition

November 24, 2021
Pints of champagne could be the next ‘Brexit dividend’

Pints of champagne could be the next ‘Brexit dividend’

December 24, 2021
Government pledges cheaper electric cars but ducks subsidy confirmation

Government pledges cheaper electric cars but ducks subsidy confirmation

0

0

0

0
Government pledges cheaper electric cars but ducks subsidy confirmation

Government pledges cheaper electric cars but ducks subsidy confirmation

July 14, 2025
Calls grow for whistleblower protections in UK’s new DEI pay gap bill

Calls grow for whistleblower protections in UK’s new DEI pay gap bill

July 14, 2025
Turn empty London offices into nightlife hotspots, says new leisure report

Turn empty London offices into nightlife hotspots, says new leisure report

July 14, 2025
Tax pubs on profit, not turnover, says Greene King boss as industry battles mounting closures

Tax pubs on profit, not turnover, says Greene King boss as industry battles mounting closures

July 14, 2025

Recent News

Government pledges cheaper electric cars but ducks subsidy confirmation

Government pledges cheaper electric cars but ducks subsidy confirmation

July 14, 2025
Calls grow for whistleblower protections in UK’s new DEI pay gap bill

Calls grow for whistleblower protections in UK’s new DEI pay gap bill

July 14, 2025
Turn empty London offices into nightlife hotspots, says new leisure report

Turn empty London offices into nightlife hotspots, says new leisure report

July 14, 2025
Tax pubs on profit, not turnover, says Greene King boss as industry battles mounting closures

Tax pubs on profit, not turnover, says Greene King boss as industry battles mounting closures

July 14, 2025

Disclaimer: ElonsVision.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 ElonsVision. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock

Copyright © 2025 ElonsVision. All Rights Reserved.