Elon's Vision
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Elon's Vision
No Result
View All Result
Home Investing

Rachel Reeves accused of leaving devolved nations in the red after NICs rise

by
June 16, 2025
in Investing
0
Rachel Reeves accused of leaving devolved nations in the red after NICs rise
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has come under mounting pressure from devolved governments after being accused of underfunding Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in the wake of her decision to increase employer national insurance contributions (NICs).

The 1.2% rise in NICs for employers on salaries above £5,000, introduced on 6 April, is being covered by the Treasury in England through direct funding. However, for the devolved administrations, Reeves has chosen to apply the Barnett formula to calculate their allocations — a move that has sparked widespread criticism.

Although the formula adjusts funding based on population size, it does not account for the significantly larger public sectors operated by Cardiff, Edinburgh and Belfast. Finance ministers in each of the devolved nations say they have been left with substantial shortfalls and have accused the UK government of breaching the UK’s own Statement of Funding Policy, which prevents one administration from taking actions that financially disadvantage the others.

In Wales, the funding gap is around £72 million annually. Welsh finance secretary Mark Drakeford confirmed the government would take £36 million from reserves to cover half the cost but warned that the remainder — to be borne by local authorities and public bodies — would mean cuts of around 14%. “We have made our position very clear with the Treasury that using the Barnett formula in this instance is a breach of the rules,” Drakeford said. “If this was a one-off, we may have been able to use more of our reserves, but as it is, this will unfairly impact Wales year after year.”

Scotland is facing a significantly larger bill, estimated at £700 million, with the Treasury offering only £339 million in additional funding. In Northern Ireland, where the shortfall is around £200 million, £146 million has been allocated — still well short of the amount needed to meet public sector obligations.

Scottish finance secretary Shona Robison has repeatedly called for the tax rise to be reversed or fully funded. “Failing that,” she said, “we have asked that they fully fund this tax increase to ensure Scotland’s NHS, councils and other public services don’t lose out on vital revenue. It feels like Scotland is now being punished for having decided to employ more people in the public sector and to invest in key public services.”

Northern Ireland’s civil service, operating under long-term financial constraints, has also raised concerns that the Treasury’s contribution does not reflect the true costs facing a devolved administration with one of the highest proportions of public sector workers in the UK.

A Treasury spokesperson defended the government’s position, insisting that the approach was in line with “agreed funding arrangements and longstanding precedent”.

But the decision has reopened debate over whether the Barnett formula, first introduced in 1978 as a temporary fix, remains suitable for a modern devolved UK. Critics say the formula fails to reflect real needs and costs — particularly for nations like Wales and Scotland that rely more heavily on public sector employment.

The row also threatens to deepen a growing divide within the Labour Party. While Labour holds power at Westminster and in Wales, tensions between Welsh Labour and the UK government have intensified. Recent polling suggests Welsh Labour is trailing behind Plaid Cymru and Reform UK in the run-up to next year’s Senedd elections, with only 18% support — a shock result that puts pressure on First Minister Eluned Morgan to demonstrate greater independence from the party’s national leadership.

As the cost of living crisis continues and public services come under growing strain, the funding dispute over national insurance could become a flashpoint in both intergovernmental relations and Labour’s internal cohesion.

Read more:
Rachel Reeves accused of leaving devolved nations in the red after NICs rise

Previous Post

Does the “Economy” Actually Exist?

Next Post

Setting global standards for family-friendly working: UK and Australian employers unite at Australia House

Next Post
Setting global standards for family-friendly working: UK and Australian employers unite at Australia House

Setting global standards for family-friendly working: UK and Australian employers unite at Australia House

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

Jay Bhattacharya on Public Health

October 12, 2021

That Bangladesh Mask Study!

December 1, 2021

Antitrust Regulation Assumes Bureaucrats Know the “Correct” Amount of Competition

November 24, 2021
Pints of champagne could be the next ‘Brexit dividend’

Pints of champagne could be the next ‘Brexit dividend’

December 24, 2021
Baltimore Corruption

Baltimore Corruption

0

0

0

0
Baltimore Corruption

Baltimore Corruption

June 16, 2025

The Certifiers Rule, So Be Prepared

June 16, 2025

Real-Life Flexibility Routines: How to Stretch Smarter, Not Harder

June 16, 2025
On the Separation of Powers and Judicial Supremacy

On the Separation of Powers and Judicial Supremacy

June 16, 2025

Recent News

Baltimore Corruption

Baltimore Corruption

June 16, 2025

The Certifiers Rule, So Be Prepared

June 16, 2025

Real-Life Flexibility Routines: How to Stretch Smarter, Not Harder

June 16, 2025
On the Separation of Powers and Judicial Supremacy

On the Separation of Powers and Judicial Supremacy

June 16, 2025

Disclaimer: ElonsVision.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 ElonsVision. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock

Copyright © 2025 ElonsVision. All Rights Reserved.