Elon's Vision
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Elon's Vision
No Result
View All Result
Home Investing

Tax increases are essential to improve social care, says Raab

by
January 24, 2022
in Investing
0
Tax increases are essential to improve social care, says Raab
0
SHARES
32
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The deputy prime minister has defended the planned rise in national insurance contributions in April, despite criticism from senior backbenchers.

Dominic Raab, the deputy prime minister, told media: “I would much rather that we didn’t have to do it, but given the pandemic and the walloping of the public finances, we do.”

The increase in contributions, agreed last year to help fund health and social care costs, have been widely criticised as a regressive tax that would hit people of working age disproportionally. It will mean a 1.25 percentage point rise in personal NIC.

Raab said he did not want to “duck, as successive governments and prime ministers have, the issue of social care, and we are making sure that we deal with the ageing population and the dementia challenges we face”.

He added: “We are the first government, and this is the first prime minister, that has grasped that nettle.” It has been suggested that Rishi Sunak is trying to distance himself from the tax. A source told The Mail on Sunday that in a meeting with MPs last week to discuss the cost-of-living increase the chancellor described the rise as “the prime minister’s tax”.

“We were left with the impression that he didn’t want to be associated with it,” the source said.

A former cabinet member joined calls for the increase in NIC to be abandoned. Robert Jenrick, the former secretary of state for housing, communities and local government, wrote in The Sunday Telegraph that postponing the rise would show that “the government’s conservative instincts remain”.

Jenrick, who was dismissed in a reshuffle last September, argued that delaying or cancelling the rise would be the quickest way to ease pressures on household budgets, given the expected rise in expenses such as energy bills.

He also wrote that “national insurance penalises work by disincentivising people to take on more hours or get promoted” and that scrapping the rise would therefore be a “sensible move”.

Last night a minister told the Daily Mail that the entire cabinet would back cancelling the national insurance rise. “We need to have a clear recovery from Covid before we start working out what we want to do about the fiscal balance. The ball is very firmly in the chancellor’s court,” the source said.

Sunak has strongly rejected any suggestion that the national insurance increase should be postponed or scrapped. “You can’t conjure money out of thin air,” one Treasury source told The Sunday Telegraph.

A government source said: “The NHS and social care levy will be brought in to ensure the NHS gets the funding it needs this year to clear the waiting lists caused by the pandemic.

“Beyond that it will pay for the prime minister’s long-term social care reform plan. The alternative is cutting large sums of spending elsewhere.”

Read more:
Tax increases are essential to improve social care, says Raab

Previous Post

Online safety bill ‘ignores some types of child abuse’

Next Post

Staycations mean boom for country house hotels

Next Post
Staycations mean boom for country house hotels

Staycations mean boom for country house hotels

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

Jay Bhattacharya on Public Health

October 12, 2021

That Bangladesh Mask Study!

December 1, 2021

Antitrust Regulation Assumes Bureaucrats Know the “Correct” Amount of Competition

November 24, 2021
Pints of champagne could be the next ‘Brexit dividend’

Pints of champagne could be the next ‘Brexit dividend’

December 24, 2021

The Political Business Cycle 50 Years Later

0

0

0

0

The Political Business Cycle 50 Years Later

May 10, 2025

Why Elon Musk Is Right: The Case Against Subsidizing Amtrak

May 10, 2025

The Gold-Silver Ratio

May 10, 2025
Friday Feature: MCP Academy

Friday Feature: MCP Academy

May 9, 2025

Recent News

The Political Business Cycle 50 Years Later

May 10, 2025

Why Elon Musk Is Right: The Case Against Subsidizing Amtrak

May 10, 2025

The Gold-Silver Ratio

May 10, 2025
Friday Feature: MCP Academy

Friday Feature: MCP Academy

May 9, 2025

Disclaimer: ElonsVision.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 ElonsVision. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock

Copyright © 2025 ElonsVision. All Rights Reserved.